arguement

[deathlord888]

here is some dumb muslim kid trying to insult me because i said gaza deserved what happened to them. of course he wouldnt say this to me at school because he is only online tough

Malik Hamadache
11 January at 15:24

you seriously think
cus some idiot terrorist group
threw some rockets at israel
that they should commit terrorism (bomb whole city)
against innocent women and children????
how does that equal out buddy


Mike Riordan
11 January at 15:35

i dont think they should purposefully kill women and children or any civ but they were doing there job and protecting there people, because gaza failed to take care of the issue


Malik Hamadache
11 January at 15:42

buddy there not doing any work
if they wanted to do a good work they would do an investigation
and find the people who are commiting these crimes and persecute them
theyre just trying to scare everyone by killing so many civilians
what they dont understand is theyre adding fuel to the fire. Even people who were calm before could become radicals. Violence is not a solution to violence. Just imagine if the CIA did that everytime they needed to find a criminal. So instead of using investigating methods and taking someone to court. They'd bomb a whole city. Buddy thats no solution.
You cant achieve peace through violence. both sides of this war are wrong.
Whoever stops this. Thats the right one.


Mike Riordan
11 January at 16:41

look at hiroshima, USA bombed that city and ended world war 2... imagine how much worse thing could of been if no one stood up against hitler


Malik Hamadache
11 January at 16:57

buddy hiroshima did not solve WWII
and i think we all know that it was the soldiers
who fought till they died in europe looking for hitler
w e buddy. im just being logical man.
killing civilians achieves nothing. if you wanna stop an enemy
you gotta fight that enemy. its common sense


Mike Riordan
11 January at 17:37

ya and they are fighting the enemy in gaza, they are trying they dont know who is who and innocent people die. and actually germany was done and japan was still fighting, so the dropped a nuke on japan they gave up and therefore ending WW 2


Mike Riordan
11 January at 17:39

"When Japan continued to reject the Potsdam terms, the United States then dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in early August. Between the two bombs, the Soviets invaded Japanese-held Manchuria, as agreed at Yalta. On August 15, 1945 Japan surrendered, ending the war.[168]"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_W...Allied_victory






man i pwn these things

[Maggotsfriend]

One thing do you need to learn how to put forward a valid argument, when he can't respond to in an appropriate matter. The Jews are in the right.

And if he thinks he can still argue it punch him out.

[deathlord888]

the jews are right, he didnt respond because he obviously knows i have more knowledge than he does

[LNT-5265F]

actually, death buddy, your a blubbering idiot. he was correct in almost everything he said - you responded like a typical american. thanks for furthering the stereotype, asshole

[freetibet]

He is probably just mad his fellow muslims can never win wars anymore

[Maggotsfriend]

He argues because in his opinion he thinks he is right, but you kind of got side tracked on the argument.

[deathlord888]

i proved my point that war does solve conflict, and he is mad because he is a muslim and his religion is getting fucked
also i am not a dirty american fuck no

[LNT-5265F]

yes,... you are

whether your in australia, arctica, or austria. you have insanely american beliefs

[freetibet]

dude he's from canada

[crazyassmetalhead]

i don't like it when people say "friend" or "buddy" or whatever in such a discussion.....it's a passive agressive pussy little tactic that tries to make them look non confrontational while if you respond to it you look like an agressive ass.

so say something there is no real rational argument to, something really fucked up that will end the discussion

like when he says:

"im just being logical man.
killing civilians achieves nothing. if you wanna stop an enemy
you gotta fight that enemy. its common sense"

respond:
Killing civilians is everything you ignorant shit, why do you think throughout the ages entire cities are razed and women and children massacred? It achieves many things, takes away what they are fighting for, takes away their supplies, prevents future conflicts by the descendants of those people and most importantly sends a message like "don't fuck with us"

they should go all roman style on their asses and start crucifying prisoners in towns and such.....or impaling their asses like dracula......doesn't even have to be prisoners really, could be just whover. the same point will get across...

or maybe they could snatch up a few random palestinians and make a video of them getting beheaded in front of a nice Isreali flag..... who knows





idk kinda ran outta steam, if i had some caffeine in my system i could do better, but i'm about to go to sleep....... so fuck it

but ya just have fun with it