Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Rogerdodger
No, my good sir, I believe that u are the fucking retard.
1.- If they take away guns, then we will be generally more weakened in defense against many things, not just terrorists and the like.
2.- Its not only about useing guns to protect ourselves, but its also about the principle of the matter. Right to bear arms is the 2nd amendment. If they take them away, thats a violation of our rights, and will encourage more rights to be slowly stripped away like that.
3.- The threat is not that much from other countries, but from within. From the power hungry rulers of america. Without guns, it will be much more easy to establish martial law, and, eventually, a full blown oligarchy/ dictatorship. See #2.
4.- you (among many others) think that by useing big words, you can sound smart. You dont. You sound like someone who is useing bigger words to cover up your stupidity and to sound like you actually know what youre talking about.
P.S.-suck my big fat stinky dick.
El Luchadores de Liberache!
|
i realize that this is old, but if i dont rant about something in this fucking stupid goddamn thread, im gonna windup severely damaging the next living organism i see. and that would be bad, cause we have kittens, and i dw hurt our kittens...... =(
1: There is no evidence that they would take away your guns. The 500% tax increase was back when he was a senator in the NINETIES, and never repeated. As well, who do you suppose makes the guns that the government uses? they certainly may outsource some labour, but i assure you, there are enough gun factories in this country that if the US government tried to enact martial law, they'd have a pretty hard time. as well, where do you suppose the troops are gonna get food for this attack? certainly, no other nation in the world is gonna support us, when we're attacking ourselves, that's the kind of thing that gets you embargoed. an attack on this nation, by this nation is not believable. if you want to turn it into a dictatorship, the only logical way to do it at this time period (and any nearby time period), would be to have the majority AGREE with you being dictator. a 48/52 split popular vote doesnt really constitute a proper majority.
2: i agree, taking away the right to bare arms would be a great encroachment on the constitution. it certainly isnt the first, tho, and i dont see you trying to stop the others, so this is a moot point for you.
3: there is no threat from within, you fucking idiot. unless you go and start a riot, you're perfectly safe, and the government is not going to attack you.
4: not one of the words he used was "big", in the sense of complexity, or potential to create difficulty of understanding. a 5th grader could have read his post. maybe that fifth grader wouldnt get what he was talking about, but the words are simple enough that he'd know what they all meant. fucking idiot.
and finally
your fucking sig
"El Luchadores de Liberache" <-- the (singular, i might add) fighters of liberace(at least, that's what im assuming you meant to say)? you do know he was gay, and a pianist, right?
cause, i mean, if that's what you meant, i can understand fighting for his freedom.....tho i dont think it really matters, he's dead.......
by all means, if you meant to say something along the lines of freedom fighters, you're so far off that it'd make spanish babies cry.