really? nothing about her being a totalitarian dictator? nothing about her politics being very right wing but she's still running as a democrat? all you have is her "wishy-washyness"? cuz i do recall, edwards ran with someone else who lost because people played on the fact that he didnt stay with his opinions....which, really, think about it, do you want a president who makes a decision and refuses to ever accept that he was wrong and pull out? the majority of america, before the election, said they wanted bush to pull out of iraq, and after the election they did as well, kerry thought going into iraq was a good thing at first, then decided that we should be pulling out, bush just said we're going to iraq and refuses to accept that we should pull out.....

and hillary really shouldnt be president, EVER, neither should rudolph giuliani, both of them want too much control, the only reason giuliani has any chance is because he did such a great job just after 9/11, took control, but noone remembers what he did before that any more.....meh, fuck it, i probably wont even vote, there's noone who's really worth it.....

oh god i hate this song...meh...fuck you all, get over your stupid opinions and die....

Neither World War One or two the United States went in "For the kill' always joined in late when the enemy was finished. But the next "World war" I can guarantee will be in the Middle East.

The next "World war" will most likely end the world.
I'm guessing it will be a nuclear war.

wasnt talking about the other world wars, i was refering to the problems in the middle east like iraq, at least this time the u.s. isnt the one spearhedding the possible offence.

and to legalize it, befor you continue to make stupid responses, befor i left i was one of the people who like you yelled at people about saying stuff they had nothing to back up with. Yes i havent kept up with all the latest political debats iv had better things to do then sit and watch tv.

but i guess no matter what i say know someone will just say that im ripping off puppetmaster or cuddles so im not going to explain myself now

That will not happen.

Well it may be a far stretch and a bit apocalyptic but it is at least possible.

Oh, it is very possible... But the thing is, there is a reason why only a few countries that are allowed to produce them... Another thing is if it dosn't happen soon, someone would have already invented a way to stop nuclear missiles (100%).

Yes i agree with Russia's advanced missile defense system its only a matter of time before their defense overrules the offense of any other country as well as America soon to follow suit. The country that worries me is Iran providing that they can develop nuclear energy quick enough.

Russia has the best defence system against missiles, nuclear missiles, scud missiles, ICBM's, etc. The United States has put more money into their defence programs, but the patriot missile systems are not that reliable... And you may ask why hasn't the Russians attacked?
1. They don't care.
2. The United States offence is their defence.
3. There is no need for the attack on the United States.

Yea but Bush may want to keep his nose out of Russia's business, I'm not quite sure what transpired last week between the U.S. and Russia but i know Putin wasn't happy about it.