Happy anniversary, over the years I have come across many conspiracy theories and I was just wondering if anyone on this sit has heard about these theories and do you believe them to have any factual backing.

I personally think that the Bush Administration knew about the attack pryor before it happend. I also think that they used this inccodent to destroy secret government document(pentagon and world trade center building #7). Also used 9/11 to invade Iraq.

i am so the bsame way.. i think they deff. knew about it nd i think they used it to cover up sum ting or destroy it....so yeas i am so wit ya rusta man...

I agree on one thing, they did know about the attack before it happened, but the information they had wasn't enough to act on. The reports filled by the government regarding 9-11 are very clear on that remark. The other thing, I will have to disagree with, If the government wanted something destroyed they would not need to dispose of it in such a destructive and irresponsible manner, they dispose of them in a much less suspicious manner away from the prying eyes of the public; the thing about the government using 9-11 as an excuse to invade Iraq, that could very well be the case, we had been wanting to invade Iraq, covertly, for many year in order to get rid of some dangerous muslim extremist groups.

About that... The goverment has destroyed documents right in front of the public eye. Remember when Bush Administration "lost" 15,000 emails. I think the government is cabable of doing this. Not to mension "misplaced" money and guns from Iraq.

Also the World Trade Center building 7 was a government fallout shelter that held secret CIA and Government documents. They say it fell because of a faulty structural design... In a government fallout shelter? I think not.

Personally I think it was planned and 9/11 and the people were sacrifice for it, with no honor, no way of defending themselfs, it's how things work. It dosn't make sence that it was a "weak structural flaw" because the damn thing had already been bombed once and had caught on fire and cleared something like 13+ floors (Don't quote me on it), and it was said the fire caused the building to collapse, when the fuel burns at 260-315 °C and the building was made from strong metal like cast iron, but let's say it was just steel, steel starts to melt at 1510 °C. It's bullshit.

i am a strong nostradamus believer.......


wierd shit

If the goverment planned it they would want it to be in the public eye and they would want it to be sloppy so it didn't look like the work of a well organized group, such as, the goverment.

I'm not a Nostradamus believer but it is pretty amazing about his predictions. I just wonder how many of them didn't come true out of the ones that did.

How could you plan a "sloppy terrorist attack"? First of all it was in the public and not to mention in the eyes of thousands of witnesses and news stations. It fell down straight all the way down, if the one side gave in wouldn't you think that it would tumble down on an angle?

Thats what I was thinking. If there was a fire the weakest point would collaspe and the rest of the building would follow in that angle, but they just collapsed strait down.