NASA & DIT.GOV pwnt.

[GhostExodus]

Information N/A

Thanks

[deathlord888]

http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/8241/lamee.jpg
not a big deal to be honest

[GhostExodus]

Information N/A

Thanks

[jadler]

mad props, from what i see here you appear to be legit. finally some people that aren't screaming 1337 when they figure out what a batch file is.

I dunno how to hack stuff like that, I'm into AI and such. I like the deep philosophical stuff behind it. Still though I pulled off some crappy remote pranks on my school back in the day.

[squeakyneb]

I dislike screenies as proof. Anything can be done with an image editor, or with Fire Bug. I don't beleive it until something big happens that hits the news. Launch nukes?

[deathlord888]

i believe him more so than i do 99% of others on here but you can never be certain

[GhostExodus]

Information N/A

Thanks

[DoG MikkyW]

Haha, ghost is good. So what you are stating, is that you don't believe someone is good, until they get their ignorant asses on the news, or they spark world war III by launching some nukes? Fuck off, ignorant cunt. (I'm getting quite creative with these, aren't I?)

[GhostExodus]

Information N/A

Thanks

[Palmer]

I dislike screenies as proof. Anything can be done with an image editor, or with Fire Bug. I don't beleive it until something big happens that hits the news. Launch nukes?

Dude, you can see it... If you knew what half of that was you'd find it legit.
even if he did edit the pic, it's accurate and shows that he at least knows what he's talking about, which then you could easily check the site to see. It's not rocket science... well actually it's computer science, but that's besides the point. xD

at teh Dog: hacking has nothing to do with being on the news... I think ghost just said mostly what I was gonna say. hacking is for the most part computer science- what do you think people do to test software or web security?? they have to make sure it isn't vulnerable which is were rumors and twists start and using the term hack becomes a trend.

@ ghost: Good information... =D

[GhostExodus]

thanks bro, and well said btw, its good to know there's others on the board that know what they are talking about. heh...

[g0d0fanarchy]

at GhostExodus;

I agree with every single word you just said. The media blows everything out of proportion (then again, they do that with everything) and the true meaning of "hacker" has been lost for ages except to a select few.

[_Slipknot]

So many smart people now adays...

[Julianibe]

I know i'm a noob and all, I hardly know anything about hacking to be honest. I know i'll be getting flamed for this. But Me, being the dumbass i am. Think you could ever do something like this to fbi.gov? Just wondering, Please don't flame me too bad. </3

[GhostExodus]

In the past ETA has exploited XSS vulnerabilities in FBI. The larger an organization is, the harder it is to maintain a level of secured infrastructure. Such organizations like FBI, DOD, NASA have 24/7 command centers that are watching all traffic inbound out bound, activity their censors are reporting, etc etc. The FBI is a primary target but mainly for those who either have a huge ego to trip out on, or are looking for something more than just bragging rights. But you still have idiots in major corporations and stuff that are plugging unsecured systems in on their network, so when that happens, your chances of nailing a machine on the network with sensitive info is much easier.

[GhostExodus]

if they haven't patched the hole in the web application, go ahead and try it for yourself lmao Just dont do it at home kids.